<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Volkswagen CC Review &#8211; A test Drive Bashing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bittangents.com/2010/02/23/2010-volkswagen-cc-review-a-test-drive-bashing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bittangents.com/2010/02/23/2010-volkswagen-cc-review-a-test-drive-bashing/</link>
	<description>Business and Information Technology Tangents is dedicated to providing quality content while informing the world about technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Auwarter</title>
		<link>http://bittangents.com/2010/02/23/2010-volkswagen-cc-review-a-test-drive-bashing/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Auwarter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brentblawat.wordpress.com/2010/02/23/2010-volkswagen-cc-review-a-test-drive-bashing/#comment-524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Epic failure? Hmmm, that&#039;s not at all what comes to mind when I look at mine. I don&#039;t know about the VR6, as it was out of my price range, but the Lux Plus is a pretty terrific car. You&#039;re singling out points that don&#039;t compare with similar cars, but you make no allowances for ways that those cars don&#039;t stack up. I wish writers would really do their homework and do a true cost comparison, just like you would if you were spending your own money, rather than a superficial, hit-and-miss comparison. I compared the Ford Fusion, Hyundai Sonata, 3 different Subarus, BMW 3 series, Audi A4 and Volvo S60. By the time you loaded up the Fusion and Sonata and any of the Suburus with similar options (Nav, etc), they were either just under or over the $31k that the CC cost. And none of these cars compared to the CC. Yes, the WRX is very fast, but it&#039;s expensive and screams &quot;boy racer.&quot; Can you really compare it to the elegance of the CC? The cars that did compare favorably, the Audi, BMW, and Volvo, are far more expensive when comparably equipped. I agree that a car that meets all your points would be quite a vehicle, but I challenge you to find one that meets ALL your points for less that 50 grand. To me, the only thing that&#039;s an &quot;epic failure&quot; is your comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epic failure? Hmmm, that&#8217;s not at all what comes to mind when I look at mine. I don&#8217;t know about the VR6, as it was out of my price range, but the Lux Plus is a pretty terrific car. You&#8217;re singling out points that don&#8217;t compare with similar cars, but you make no allowances for ways that those cars don&#8217;t stack up. I wish writers would really do their homework and do a true cost comparison, just like you would if you were spending your own money, rather than a superficial, hit-and-miss comparison. I compared the Ford Fusion, Hyundai Sonata, 3 different Subarus, BMW 3 series, Audi A4 and Volvo S60. By the time you loaded up the Fusion and Sonata and any of the Suburus with similar options (Nav, etc), they were either just under or over the $31k that the CC cost. And none of these cars compared to the CC. Yes, the WRX is very fast, but it&#8217;s expensive and screams &#8220;boy racer.&#8221; Can you really compare it to the elegance of the CC? The cars that did compare favorably, the Audi, BMW, and Volvo, are far more expensive when comparably equipped. I agree that a car that meets all your points would be quite a vehicle, but I challenge you to find one that meets ALL your points for less that 50 grand. To me, the only thing that&#8217;s an &#8220;epic failure&#8221; is your comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane</title>
		<link>http://bittangents.com/2010/02/23/2010-volkswagen-cc-review-a-test-drive-bashing/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 02:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brentblawat.wordpress.com/2010/02/23/2010-volkswagen-cc-review-a-test-drive-bashing/#comment-522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just bought a left over 2010 CC. Its a sharp car but the DSG transmission sucks. I hope VW comes up with a fix for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a left over 2010 CC. Its a sharp car but the DSG transmission sucks. I hope VW comes up with a fix for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://bittangents.com/2010/02/23/2010-volkswagen-cc-review-a-test-drive-bashing/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brentblawat.wordpress.com/2010/02/23/2010-volkswagen-cc-review-a-test-drive-bashing/#comment-492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very deep comparison. Nice post and very good info
the price for this scar is very reasonable as compared to other cars from VW.
if the specs and features are considered then this is very good car and even the $27000 to $38000 price tag is also good.
the mileage is very nice with 21 to 31 mpg. Great car]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very deep comparison. Nice post and very good info<br />
the price for this scar is very reasonable as compared to other cars from VW.<br />
if the specs and features are considered then this is very good car and even the $27000 to $38000 price tag is also good.<br />
the mileage is very nice with 21 to 31 mpg. Great car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

